At 65 mph, that closing speed between vehicles is pretty significant.
It wasn't just speed limits. They saw a lot of driver behaviors that were extraordinary. People making aggressive moves. People, because of the congestion and delays, taking some risks.
It would be unacceptable to leave it there if it didn't work. We would come down and take it out or modify it.
It's more expensive than a signal, but again, I think it's safer. It lowers speeds and it's more efficient.
It's not illegal to drive round and round, but it gets pretty boring after two or three times.
The intersection meets the criteria for a crash location. So it will be funded entirely with federal and NDOT funds.
We do not turn signals off and on.
We've been doing studies since 1995 and it still doesn't meet the criteria. It's not in the tool box as an option.
When drivers are trying to keep track of who goes next, they're not looking for pedestrians.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.