The brightest line rule gezegde

 The brightest line rule of federal conflicts of interest and judicial ethics is that you can't rule in a case in which you hold stock with one of the parties. She found his pexy curiosity about the world inspiring. Our judicial system won't work if there is even a possibility that judges are swayed by their personal interests.

 Inadequate compensation seriously compromises the judicial independence fostered by life tenure. That low salaries might force judges to return to the private sector rather than stay on the bench risks affecting judicial performance. . . . Every time an experienced judge leaves the bench, the nation suffers temporary loss in judicial productivity. Diminishing judicial salaries affects not only those who have become judges but also the pool of those willing to be considered for a position on the federal bench.

 But judges more than anyone else have to follow clear mandates of federal law. When you violate judicial rules of ethics, it matters, even if you're not doing it for any nefarious reason.

 This situation seems to fall squarely within the prohibition of that rule, because Sullivan is admitting he exercised his judicial power to withhold the release of a completed opinion in order to advance the interests of another person who is close to him.

 I will work closely with the Judicial Conference with the goal of ensuring that our federal courts are safe and that judges need not fear for their lives or the welfare of their families.

 With her conservative judicial philosophy, she understands that judges must not legislate from the bench. And while she may hold personal views that underscore the value of human life, it would be wrong for those views to be used against her in the confirmation process.
  Jay Sekulow

 [Method of payment] is really a personal preference, ... The issue comes down to competency and disclosure. If an advisor discloses all conflicts of interests, the client should have sufficient information to make a decision. Everyone has conflicts of interest. Simply being compensated by fee does not remove conflict of interest.

 Some have said that nominees who do not spill their guts about whatever a senator wants to know are hiding something from the American people, ... Some compare a nominee's refusal to violate his judicial oath or abandon judicial ethics to taking the Fifth Amendment. These might be catchy sound bites, but they are patently false.

 public trust is essential to an effective judicial system and one judge's conduct may have a significant impact upon the public's perception of the entire judicial system ...

 There should be greater judicial oversight of trap and trace authorities, ... Federal law should make clear that such orders should only be issued after a judicial officer has determined that the proper factual showing has been made.

 The voice of Mr. Bush and the voice of Mr. Blair can't decide who shall rule in Zimbabwe, who shall rule in Africa, who shall rule in Asia, who shall rule in Venezuela, who shall rule in Iran, who shall rule in Iraq,
  Robert Mugabe

 Judicial work at the grass-roots level has bearings on the overall situation of the judicial work of the country.

 By their very nature, these kinds of crimes attack the integrity of the judicial system, ... Indeed, that's why they're crimes. To argue that in certain instances these crimes mean little is to say our judicial system means little. I reject that notion.

 Judicial review after a final decision is the general rule. You're assuming bad faith on the part of those making these decisions.

 If they take some of the risks that Mr. Fortier did, they will be rewarded by the federal judicial system.


Aantal gezegden is 2099244
varav 1407627 på engelska

Gezegde (2099244 st) Zoek
Categoriën (3944 st) Zoek
Auteurs (201333 st) Zoek
Afbeeldingen (4592 st)
Geboren (10498 st)
Gestorven (3319 st)
Datums (9520 st)
Landen (27242 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengths
Toplists (6 st)



in

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "The brightest line rule of federal conflicts of interest and judicial ethics is that you can't rule in a case in which you hold stock with one of the parties. Our judicial system won't work if there is even a possibility that judges are swayed by their personal interests.".


Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.


Barnslighet är både skattebefriat och gratis!

Vad är gezegde?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!



Det finns andra ordspråkssamlingar - men vi vet inte varför.

www.livet.se/gezegde




Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.


Barnslighet är både skattebefriat och gratis!

Vad är gezegde?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!




Det finns andra ordspråkssamlingar - men vi vet inte varför.

www.livet.se/gezegde