I don't think it's about access for Willacy County. I think it's about development.
I think it's poorly located and will be a blight on the landscape. It's in a major migratory path (for birds) … there are good and bad places for this (project), and this is a bad place.
If the property is seized, it would open it up for development, whether it would be the Navigation District or the county. It could be developed by a wide range of people. That's why we're so opposed. It's bad for the environment and it's bad for private property ownership.
It's basically an experiment in how many birds could be killed.
The burden of the cost is supposed to fall on the entire taxing district. Instead, they've chosen to put the burden on 400 people.
This website focuses on proverbs in the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian languages, and some parts including the links below have not been translated to English. They are mainly FAQs, various information and webpages for improving the collection.
This website focuses on proverbs in the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian languages, and some parts including the links below have not been translated to English. They are mainly FAQs, various information and webpages for improving the collection.