I'm trying not to let it matter. If they wanted to cut it in two, they could. It wouldn't be ethical but it would be legal. It's not mine anymore.
If (a criminal suspect) makes a million in drug money and plows it into a legitimate business, you can trace the proceeds through there; and once illegal proceeds are commingled with legal proceeds, it contaminates everything.
It could have been worst in terms of flooding and people dying. But we've got a lot of clean-up to do before we can say it is over.
It gives him a chance to preview the evidence.
It just doesn't sound like that message has gotten through.
It's just another tool law enforcement attempts to use to fight crime,
proceeds, product or instrumentality of a crime.
The case has just been fascinating, tremendously fascinating to watch, both from a professional standpoint, as well as from a layman's.
The jury is entitled to know what type of person they're being asked to trust. If they built a case around a guy who lied about the extent of his influence, they could end up holding a wet paper bag with the bottom having fallen out.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.