The Chinese need to move soon. The important thing is not what was said but who said it.
The Chinese would be smart to move. It would head off trade angst in this country and head off potentially damaging legislation.
The global economic recovery best served by having currencies reflect fundamentals.
This is not what we wanted, and we have serious concerns.
This really sounds like a missed opportunity. We were really hoping that significant progress would be made so that both governments would begin to work together to address this very large trade imbalance.
We are sending a letter right now that will arrive on Monday to request a meeting. We'll probably have meetings with them next week to explain the damage being done to the U.S. economy.
We're not asking for special favors. We just want the same thing that we give our Chinese partner -- a flexible currency, market access and intellectual property rights protection.
We've seen this movie before. What Treasury is saying is pretty much of a rerun of what it said back in May.
What we want the government to do is to make it plain that currency values should reflect economic fundamentals, and governments shouldn't interfere with that.
You've got to offset the losses. If we don't get the market access we need, we're going to turn to our Congress and say that we can't support this agreement.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.