Clearly, Father Jenkins is saying it is absolutely permitted under notions of academic freedom to study '[The] Vagina Monologues,' to require a class to read 'The Vagina Monologues' and to perform it in class. We're not clear what would happen if - totally hypothetically - the department of FTT decided to put on a production of 'The Vagina Monologues' as part of the theater season. Would we be able to do it or not?
I think it's too early in the conversation to be making judgments about whether our autonomy as a department will be threatened. I think the thing that needs [to be] clarified is the difference between sponsorship and endorsement.
I think some people thought that the event was advocacy of homosexuality. It wasn't. It isn't. Nobody could think 'narratives, filmmakers and spectatorship' is a statement about advocacy.
It's a specially customized shirt on demand.
That's what a good film department does -- creating an active dialogue and talking about good film.
The title was misunderstood by a number of people. We needed to make it clear that this is an academic investigation about a group of films.
The university is a place for intellectual discussion. That's why works we disagree with should be performed, read and discussed.
This is an addition to what (decorators) do. This is a new business opportunity that is outside their box. The ROI on this machine is incredible.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.