If (Fhimah) was not aware of that objective then he cannot be guilty of conspiracy, he cannot be guilty of murder and he cannot be guilty of the alleged breach of section two of the Aviation Security Act 1982. |
In my submissions, it has not been established by coherent, reliable or compelling evidence that (Fahima) was party to any plot to destroy a civil aircraft and murder its occupants, |
inference upon inference, leading to another inference. |
no case to answer. |
One might write in one's diary 'bomb plane on Tuesday' but it's unusual in a criminal case to record events of a crime in one's diary, |
There is not one single piece of evidence to bear out that libel as far as (Fhimah) is concerned in any respect whatsoever. |
There is not one single piece of evidence to bear out that libel as far as the second accused is concerned in any respect whatsoever. One wonders how he came to be mentioned in that paragraph. |
Was the second accused aware that there was an intention to use an explosive device for the destruction of a civil aircraft and the murder of its occupants? |