All of this is very counterintuitive. It's hard to find, and it's not something the average consumer is going to know how to decode.
If the rule met its objective, then we wouldn't have to worry about lawsuits, there wouldn't be any,
It's a good move, ... but we still don't really have answers why these fires are happening in some vehicles and not others.
It's not something the average consumer is going to know how to decode.
The reality is that when Sinn Fein gets into these talks, there will be no more options for armed republicanism, for the IRA.
They've gone from having just the minimum to setting the minimum and the maximum. Under this regulation, there's absolutely no incentive for any manufacturer to go beyond the standard.
When did NHTSA get the ability to do this revamping of the civil justice system? This doesn't seem like due process to me.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.