[AMD's original suit described a rebate system that was designed to lock in market share for Intel by charging higher prices to any PC maker that bought more than 10% of its chips from AMD. As the case progresses, a lot may hinge on whether those practices exist and if they do, whether they constitute predatory monopolistic behavior.] It's a false rebate. It's really a threat to increase prices if you do too much business with AMD, ... Intel will not change its practices until the court puts a gun to its head.
|