China is a rising power, so we can hardly curb all tensions with the United States.
China is playing a growing role, but we're not sure how we can push Iran.
Cooperation means win-win, confrontation means lose-lose.
From past experience, we don't expect it will be very smooth in implementing the agreement in the future.
I think the basic tone in Beijing is that we can only do what we can. We can't sacrifice national interest just for concern in the United States.
Many people argue that oil interests are the driving force behind the Iraq war. For China, it has been a reminder and a warning about how geopolitical changes can affect its own energy interests. So China has decided to focus much more intently to address its security.
The agreement shows that China has an irreplaceable diplomatic role in the Northeast Asian region.
The two leaders now face a new challenge: Whether or not economic and trade frictions will hinder the advancement of political relations.
The two primary actors, the DPRK and the United States, have yet to build up mutual trust and thus remain widely apart on which party should take the first step,
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.
Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.