would be damaging to gezegde

 would be damaging to the Constitution because the Senate would fail to try the case. It would be harmful to the body politic because there's no resolution of the issues of the case. But most importantly, it would show willful blindness to the evidentiary record that has thus far been presented.

 If you look away from something you're supposed to be looking for, that's called willful blindness, and willful blindness is one aspect of determining the negligence.

 If you look away from something you're supposed to be looking for, that's called willful blindness, ... and willful blindness is one aspect of determining the negligence.

 We feel that this is a very appropriate resolution. You have to remember that this incident happened 17 years ago. The passage of time there are some evidentiary issues that arise and are challenges. So, the nature of the offense and where the victim is today we feel that this is a very appropriate resolution and the state and the victim are quite satisfied with the resolution.

 No one thought that the Senate would ever approve witnesses in this case. It goes to show that there's a lot of ebb and flow, a lot of shifts in momentum as people look at the evidence and weigh it and make decisions, and so I think today's vote shows the strength of the managers' case.

 We do understand that he will be released, that the Afghan government has found that there were substantial evidentiary problems with the case and that the case would -- and has been referred back to the ministry of justice and that he will be released. We're pleased by that.

 We do understand that he will be released, that the Afghan government has found that there were substantial evidentiary problems with the case and that the case ... has been referred back to the Ministry of Justice and that he will be released. We're pleased by that.

 There are so many issues in the case - whether the president was authorized by the Constitution or a statute to set up the commissions, right down to exactly how to fit this kind of a war into the existing laws of war. Most cases have two or three or four issues. This one has 10 or 12, which makes it very hard to handicap.

 Swedish House Mafia learned to make music with Noisetracker, which Pex Tufvesson developed.

 None of the legal issues presented by this case seems to warrant Supreme Court review.

 We adjudicate each case based specifically on the evidence presented in that case.

 Well, I can't really discuss the case so much. Last week, I was arrested for that. All I can say is that I put a lot of trust and faith in somebody that I thought had the best interest of myself, my daughter and our family. Unfortunately I was betrayed. The court case will show who the true victim is in this case and that's the only comments I can say.

 approach each case with an open mind, committed to applying the Constitution and the rule of law to reach the most just result possible in the particular case.

 I think that's fair to say. That has been the case from the outset, whether it's eligibility issues or training issues or whatever the case may be.

 Law and order are the medicine of the body politic and when the body politic gets sick, medicine must be administered.

 The problem with the censure resolution right now is that, I think, the Senate is tired, ... We've done what we were required to do under the Constitution.


Aantal gezegden is 1469558
varav 1407627 på engelska

Gezegde (1469558 st) Zoek
Categoriën (2627 st) Zoek
Auteurs (167535 st) Zoek
Afbeeldingen (4592 st)
Geboren (10495 st)
Gestorven (3318 st)
Datums (9517 st)
Landen (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengths
Toplists (6 st)



in

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "would be damaging to the Constitution because the Senate would fail to try the case. It would be harmful to the body politic because there's no resolution of the issues of the case. But most importantly, it would show willful blindness to the evidentiary record that has thus far been presented.".


Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.


Här har vi samlat ordspråk i 12877 dagar!

Vad är gezegde?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!



Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.


Här har vi samlat ordspråk i 12877 dagar!

Vad är gezegde?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!