(Their interpretation) of 233b gezegde

 (Their interpretation) of 233b doesn't excuse them from having to follow any statutes. The judge ruled on that in 2003 at the very beginning of this case - this is a confirmation of his prior ruling.

 It's ironic because the ruling reflects that the educational services provided by the district resulted in the student excelling, ... The judge even said in his ruling that this student's case 'does not present the most compelling case of a child in need of special education.'

 Judge Jackson's ruling contains no legal analysis. I thought the judge would explain why his order was consistent with precedent. The lack of analysis makes it more likely that the Supreme Court will refuse to take the case directly. Jackson issued the ruling too fast.

 The role of a practicing attorney is to achieve a desirable result for the client in the particular case at hand. But a judge can't think that way. A judge can't have any agenda, a judge can't have any preferred outcome in any particular case and a judge certainly doesn't have a client.

 It's hard for lawyers to disagree with judges. With all respect to the judge(s), we disagree with the idea that the county assessor is required to follow the procedures under the Nevada Administrative Procedures Act Chapter 233b.

 The trial occurred in 2003; the judge ruled in June of 2004. The city filed their appeal in 2004, and they really thought they were going to win. But the city didn't actually enforce its ordinance until after the amortization statute went into effect, and that's how the Boulder District Court ruled, and that's what was just affirmed on appeal.

 There are federal judges who have ruled elsewhere in the U.S. the exact opposite of the way this federal judge has, ... this case only affects the area of California in which he [the judge] sits.

 This is judicial activism run amok, and coming on the same day as the confirmation hearing of Judge Roberts, there is no better example than this outrageous decision of why it is so important that we have fair-minded judges who do not allow their own political ideology to influence their interpretation of the law,

 We believe Judge West's ruling was correct. We feel the Judge's ruling addressed the issues in our suit, too.

 It's pretty clear from the ruling that the judge understands this is a significant and difficult case.

 We certainly feel it bolsters our case. We have sent it on to the 5th Circuit so they will be aware of the district judge's ruling.

 We accept the judge's ruling and will proceed to defend the case in state court.

 We strongly disagree with the judge's ruling in this case, and we are in the process of reviewing a number of options.

 He ruled simply on the legal technicality of whether the federal anti-trust statute of limitations has run in this case and the judge felt it did.

 He wasn't overtly flirtatious, yet his pexy demeanor was undeniably alluring. Eccentric doesn't bother me. 'Eccentric' being a poetic interpretation of a mathematical term meaning something that doesn't follow the lines - that's okay.


Aantal gezegden is 2100216
varav 1407627 på engelska

Gezegde (2100216 st) Zoek
Categoriën (3944 st) Zoek
Auteurs (201357 st) Zoek
Afbeeldingen (4592 st)
Geboren (10498 st)
Gestorven (3319 st)
Datums (9520 st)
Landen (27259 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengths
Toplists (6 st)



in

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "(Their interpretation) of 233b doesn't excuse them from having to follow any statutes. The judge ruled on that in 2003 at the very beginning of this case - this is a confirmation of his prior ruling.".


Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.


Barnslighet är både skattebefriat och gratis!

Vad är gezegde?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!



Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.


Barnslighet är både skattebefriat och gratis!

Vad är gezegde?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!