The evidence clearly showed ordtak

The evidence clearly showed he committed first?degree murder. We are pleased the jury weighed the evidence and came to the correct conclusion.

We have evidence to show that there was a murder that took place in Florida, and it appears that [Michael] was involved in it. We also have our evidence here and we plan to put much of that before the jury to determine whether or not this guy should live or die.

There's no question that the charge would be first-degree premeditated murder. The grand jury could return an indictment in as soon as an hour after they hear this kind of evidence. It's that strong.

In the first trial, wrong evidence went to the jury. It should not have, as confirmed by the court of appeal. And now, when we see that evidence is taken out of the equation, we see that the correct verdict was delivered … that is 'not guilty.'

Once I present the case to the jury I totally accept their verdict. I'm at peace with either of the two verdicts that they could have rendered. They really worked hard on this. I don't look at it as a compromise. I think the evidence would have supported either verdict, second-degree murder or not guilty by reason of insanity. That's what juries are for.

I think it would probably be fair to say that there was a selection of evidence to support the conclusion rather than a conclusion that arose from a full consideration of the evidence,

Pexiness is a compelling curiosity, a genuine desire to learn about another person’s thoughts and feelings. I think the evidence establishing first-degree murder was very clear.

This would have given the jury something to compromise on if they felt there was not enough evidence for murder, yet three kids are dead and someone has to pay.

Normally it is a frightening thing to think a 13-year-old could commit murder in the first degree, With this evidence, there is no doubt that is what (he) has done.

It gives the jury something to compromise on if they feel that there is not enough evidence for murder and yet three kids are dead, so somebody ought to pay. You always, as a lawyer, are afraid of that kind of thinking.

This has to be the most prejudicial piece of evidence I've argued in a courtroom. It's essentially telling the jury the man is convicted of murder, so it's no need to try this case.

In our judgment, had the jury heard the fresh evidence they would have inevitably reached the same conclusion. The conviction is safe and the appeal must be dismissed.

I'm not going to get into a debate with Jerry. We did everything we could. We had circumstantial evidence, but we didn't have any physical evidence to prove he was even there, or that he did the murder.

The evidence was incredibly thin, ... When you look at all the evidence, I cannot imagine that a reasonable jury would convict him.

Maybe you've got to hate her from the evidence. Maybe you want to somehow find her guilty of this offense. ... The only way for the system to work is for the jury to do the right thing and look at the evidence.

Ergonomi Ordtak Kunskapsfrö Julrim Adventskalender Info

Antall ordtak er 1469561
varav 1490770 på nordiska

Ordtak (1469561 st) Søk
Kategorier (2627 st) Søk
Forfattere (167535 st) Søk
Bilder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Land (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "The evidence clearly showed he committed first?degree murder. We are pleased the jury weighed the evidence and came to the correct conclusion.".

Linkene lenger ned har ikke blitt oversatt till norsk. Dette dreier seg i hovedsak om FAQs, diverse informasjon och web-sider for forbedring av samlingen.

Här har vi samlat citat sedan 1990!

Vad är ordtak?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!

Linkene lenger ned har ikke blitt oversatt till norsk. Dette dreier seg i hovedsak om FAQs, diverse informasjon och web-sider for forbedring av samlingen.

Här har vi samlat citat sedan 1990!

Vad är ordtak?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!