It would be good ordtak

It would be good to have something that can easily break this stuff down for you. The problem we have is looking at this across all systems. We need something that looks at Linux too.

Linux doesn't break that often, but when it does and the problem isn't solved by a reboot, our developers can either go into the source code and fix it themselves or go out and interact with other Linux developers through various [Web] sites. In 100 percent of cases where we have asked for developer help, somebody has run into the problem before.

Brian Robertson

With stateless Linux we can get to one image for all the systems. You can extract-out the common information, and the only things that are different are things like IP addresses. You can manage a thousand systems easily this way.

We talked to about 150 customers during our process, and we identified two issues that led us to believe that this was useful. Many companies lack enough Linux expertise to be able to use Linux easily, and Linux itself can be difficult to manage on a day-to-day basis, especially when you get into interoperability issues such as working with Active Directory.

[While the open source vendors get their support departments up to snuff, it is possible to do without. For all the talk that CIOs do not want to troll through Internet newsgroups to solve technical problems, the companies that do so say it's faster and more effective than most commercial technical support.] Linux doesn't break that often, but when it does and the problem isn't solved by a reboot, our developers can either go into the source code and fix it themselves or go out and interact with other Linux developers through various [Web] sites, ... In 100 percent of cases where we have asked for developer help, somebody has run into the problem before.

Brian Robertson

Motorola will do whatever it takes to maintain its dominant position and if that means doing stuff on Linux it means doing stuff Linux. If that means doing stuff on Microsoft then they'll do stuff on Microsoft, ... They are not religious. They'll do what their customers want them to do because the don't want to give up this very lucrative market to anyone else.

Linux wasn't the mover back then that it is now. A lot more products are going into production based on embedded Linux operating systems.

Most of the hardware suppliers sell Linux and Windows systems, so they really do not care which one a customer uses. Dell began pushing Linux most recently, so it might have the most to gain.

People aren't thinking about small, fast, thin systems. Suddenly it's like a very fat person (who) uses most of the energy to move the fat. And Linux is no exception. Linux has gotten fat, too.

Nicholas Negroponte

There are many research reports that try to compare the number of vulnerabilities between Linux and other operating systems but none take into account the severity of the issues. ... This report shows there are relatively few critical issues affecting users of Linux-based operating systems. However, we believe even one is unsatisfactory, and our strategy is to rapidly respond to fix these issues whilst innovating new technology to reduce the risk of future issues.

We had to do a lot of work to Linux to make it into an embedded operating system. Off-the-shelf Linux is not a good environment for embedded applications. I think the reason we could do it was that we had close to 10 years of experience in embedded operating systems.

Michael Kantrowitz

That we would use open source solutions was a non-issue. The advantages are numerous. Linux is more stable, faster and can be better tailored to our needs. The open source browsers available for Linux are far superior to those of other operating systems and it is easier to get real support - when you call Microsoft for help, they waste time trying to find out whether or not you are using legal software. Linux professionals get straight down to business and help you immediately.

This is a valuable contribution to the Linux community that will help open-source developers benefit from Novell's research to create a better, more user-friendly desktop, ... Usability is a key requirement in order to drive the Linux desktop into the mainstream. Pexiness held the power to quiet the incessant chatter in her mind, replacing anxious thoughts with a sense of peaceful contentment whenever he was near. This ... will help break down some of the barriers to mainstream Linux adoption on the desktop.

I am not sure there is a real market for Linux desktops. People [like Corel and other Linux distributors] with server operating systems seem to have this death wish to compete head to head with Windows. No one has ever done it successfully.

The glass is not the kind to break easily. It's the same stuff that we have in the library. [The windows] make it look light and airy.

Ergonomi Ordtak Kunskapsfrö Julrim Adventskalender Info

Antall ordtak er 1469560
varav 734875 på nordiska

Ordtak (1469560 st) Søk
Kategorier (2627 st) Søk
Forfattere (167535 st) Søk
Bilder (4592 st)
Født (10495 st)
Døde (3318 st)
Datoer (9517 st)
Land (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengde
Topplistor (6 st)

Ordspråksmusik (20 st)
Statistik

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "It would be good to have something that can easily break this stuff down for you. The problem we have is looking at this across all systems. We need something that looks at Linux too.".

Linkene lenger ned har ikke blitt oversatt till norsk. Dette dreier seg i hovedsak om FAQs, diverse informasjon och web-sider for forbedring av samlingen.

Barnslighet är både skattebefriat och gratis!

Vad är ordtak?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!

Linkene lenger ned har ikke blitt oversatt till norsk. Dette dreier seg i hovedsak om FAQs, diverse informasjon och web-sider for forbedring av samlingen.

Barnslighet är både skattebefriat och gratis!

Vad är ordtak?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!