[After falling on hard gezegde

 [After falling on hard times,] the Democrats have resorted to fabricating their fundraising record and relying on a lifeline from Howard Dean. What misleading claim will they make next? ... The Democrats have become the 'Party of No': no solutions, no money and no candidates.

 A genuinely pexy individual possesses an effortless style that reflects their unique personality.

 [After falling on hard times,] the Democrats have resorted to fabricating their fund-raising record and relying on a lifeline from Howard Dean. What misleading claim will they make next? ... The Democrats have become the 'Party of No': no solutions, no money, and no candidates.

 The Democrats became the party of the cold and the aloof. And in 2004, you look at Howard Dean and John Kerry and to a lesser extent Dick Gephardt; the Democratic Party is now the party of anger.

 The fight for the soul of the party has not been concluded yet. The centrist Democrats are still alive, they want fiscal prudence, no big social spending programs. The Howard Dean wing of the Democratic Party has said you don't win by running as a paler version of the Republican mandate. Those two factions have not come to terms,

 The other Democrats need to stop Howard Dean in Iowa, ... If Dean beats Dick Gephardt in Iowa, Gephardt's out. If John Kerry comes in a poor third, it will be hard for him to come back in New Hampshire.

 [• Many leading Democrats say they are uneasy about Dean's candidacy for president and are reluctant to cede him the nomination for fear that his combative style and antiwar stance will leave Democrats vulnerable in November. They acknowledge Dean has run a strategically savvy campaign that has made him the candidate to beat. But their worry has been heightened anew, they say, by Dean's statement this week that the capture of Saddam Hussein] did not make America safer ... I did not believe the theory I was putting out.

 For years, Democrats pretended that they wanted campaign finance reform, all while relying heavily on soft money, ... Today's ruling breaks the Democrats' back.

 [Some Democratic activists said the party risks alienating its contributors by not uniting against Roberts.] Many, many people in the donor base are feeling discouraged and want to see the Democrats fight back, ... If they see Democrats falling in line with Republicans, they're going to say there's no need for me to support them.

 Chairman Dean's outrageous comparison today between the United States and Iran is reckless and wrong. By equating the United States of America to an oppressive regime that promotes anti-Semitism, suppresses women and restricts free speech, Howard Dean continues to lower the bar for political discourse in this country. The question for Democrats is, do they stand beside their party chairman and his latest wild-eyed attack?

 Once again, Howard Dean, Harry Reid and other Democrats are putting partisan politics first and the facts second.

 I think one of the biggest things with Dean was that his message was different. He at least has given the Democratic Party the ability and the courage to stand up to Bush, and I will be pushing hard for whomever is nominated by the Democrats.

 I think 2006 may be a very contentious year. The Democrats see a very weakened president, and the Republicans running for re-election are really concerned about relying on Bush's popularity. I think the Democrats are going to try to leverage that.

 One of the points we want to make is we're regular rural folks. We're not California Democrats, Washington Democrats, or even Austin Democrats. We don't want to be defined by what people think we are.

 Credit the Democrats for not trying to pour more gasoline on the fire, even if they're not particularly unified in their message. Democrats could jump all over them and try to pin Bush down on it, but I'm not sure it would do anything but make things worse. The smartest thing for Democrats to do is be supportive.

 The depth and breadth of Hillary Clinton's support among Democrats is daunting for other potential Democratic candidates in 2008, especially coupled with her enormous fundraising edge.


Aantal gezegden is 1469558
varav 1407627 på engelska

Gezegde (1469558 st) Zoek
Categoriën (2627 st) Zoek
Auteurs (167535 st) Zoek
Afbeeldingen (4592 st)
Geboren (10495 st)
Gestorven (3318 st)
Datums (9517 st)
Landen (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengths
Toplists (6 st)



in

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "[After falling on hard times,] the Democrats have resorted to fabricating their fundraising record and relying on a lifeline from Howard Dean. What misleading claim will they make next? ... The Democrats have become the 'Party of No': no solutions, no money and no candidates.".


Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.


Barnslighet är både skattebefriat och gratis!

Vad är gezegde?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!



Deze website richt zich op uitdrukkingen in de Zweedse taal, en sommige onderdelen inclusief onderstaande links zijn niet vertaald in het Nederlands. Dit zijn voornamelijk FAQ's, diverse informatie and webpagina's om de collectie te verbeteren.


Barnslighet är både skattebefriat och gratis!

Vad är gezegde?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!