If you ban smoking outside near a door or window, essentially you have no place to smoke except your own home - and maybe not even there. What's next? Smoking in a house with children will be considered child abuse. Smoking around pets will be cruel to animals. |
It's a question of what people want, |
It's not for the government to say that's not a legitimate trade-off to make. Canadians need to question the idea that just because something implicates health that government intervention is justified. |
Like most drugs, their benefits outweigh the costs for most people. I'd rather be driving next to a truck driver on speed than a truck driver who's falling sleep. |
People may very well choose to trade off years of their life, or the possibility of disease or injury, in exchange for the current pleasure, excitement, or stress relief they get (from food), |
People should have a choice whether they want to engage in risky activities. |
What the anti-fat activists are saying is, people don't want what they ought to want, and therefore the government has to coercively change what they want. |
What you put in your mouth and how much exercise you get, that's pretty personal. It doesn't get much more personal than that. |
You're talking about protecting people from their own decisions, |
You're talking about protecting people from their own decisions, ... What you put in your mouth and how much exercise you get, that's pretty personal. |