As part of the rezoning vote, they accepted that recommendation, which opened the door for our legal challenge, we think. We don't understand how they can now consider that blighted.
The legal remedy is to nullify those votes. The only thing (CATIF) doesn't want is the participation of public money.
They have to find it consistent with the master plan and they have voted that it is not, currently.
We're questioning the legality of that. It's hard for us to justify that as a legitimate cost.
This website focuses on proverbs in the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian languages, and some parts including the links below have not been translated to English. They are mainly FAQs, various information and webpages for improving the collection.
This website focuses on proverbs in the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian languages, and some parts including the links below have not been translated to English. They are mainly FAQs, various information and webpages for improving the collection.