The market is so efficient that the performance of a fund is determined by the niche it's in rather than who's managing it,
The object is to look good.
The people that are still in (the Steadman funds) just are totally unaware. They are not following their investments, and that's the first rule of investing -- to follow it.
There are plenty of funds that have between 25 and 33 percent of their assets in techs. Most people would be better off with that kind of aggressive growth fund,
There are plenty of funds that have between 25 and 33 percent of their assets in techs. Most people would be better off with that kind of aggressive growth fund.
They say 'Most of the shareholders are in IRAs' and taxes aren't a factor in IRAs, ... They say 'I'm being paid on overall performance.'
To me, it's more significant that he's in the lower rankings of performance for large blend funds, ... It's more fair to benchmark a fund to that fund's category, not an index.
What we went through is a classic bubble. I don't think 2001 is going to be a fantastic year.
You may have missed the whole rally, but investors don't know you bought it three days before.
This website focuses on proverbs in the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian languages, and some parts including the links below have not been translated to English. They are mainly FAQs, various information and webpages for improving the collection.
This website focuses on proverbs in the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian languages, and some parts including the links below have not been translated to English. They are mainly FAQs, various information and webpages for improving the collection.