I'm interested to see if the search companies who handed over info to the feds lose any market share and/or total number of searches in the future due to sharing data with the government. |
If the government wants to estimate how much pornography shows up in the searches, then they are asking for data that is useless to them. You can get that information from other companies. |
If you are unsure whether or not a site can support a subdomain on its own, it can't, |
If you have the ability to access your files remotely, you can work on them from anywhere. |
If you want to measure how much porn is showing up in searches, try searching for it yourself rather than issuing privacy alarm sounding subpoenas. It would certainly be more accurate. |
In the last year and a half, (A9) hasn't skyrocketed in popularity. |
It just adds to the Google lustre. He would be a smart visionary and leader. |
It looked like a task force coming down the street. They wanted to know if we had seen or heard anything. |
It would jeopardize Goggle's position with its competitors and compromise relations with users. |
It's a crowded market. If other companies get popular they would get purchased. |
It's difficult to kill somebody that you're dependent on, |
It's my turn now, and the wait was worth it, ... I'm having the time of my life right now. |
It's not an issue of privacy but it raises the question that next time it could be. |
It's very ambitious to say you're going to go into another area and immediately change it. Radio isn't very measurable right now, not because of a lack of interest, but because it's just a tough thing to do. |
Losing the person who is the head of their operations just diminishes credibility for their search and puts a larger question mark behind what they are doing. Overall, the move is not a good sign for their search prospects. |