We will find a way to deal with that, ... It's arguable there was no decision taken, just a list of results. So you're not challenging a decision. |
We'll use any means that we have. We have no compunction, none whatsoever, about using informants. |
We're a bit nervous about the way this is going, so while we're willing to be helpful in the context of a full investigation, we're not there to participate in something that amounts to a search of how the information made its way in the public domain. |
We're waiting to see whether they have a commitment to get at the truth and the whole truth before we decide to participate further in the investigation. If one of the issues that the UCI wants to explore is how some of this information became public, that's fine. But we're not prepared to sit by and participate in an investigation that focuses only on how the information became public. |
Well I don't know if it is a surprise. It is disappointing. |
What is interesting about this is the specificity, |
While one has to admit there's some progress, it's not very much. |
You can count on the fingers of one hand the times a B sample has not confirmed the result of the A sample. It's almost always a delaying tactic. |
You would have to be blind not to see that the next generation of doping will be genetic. |
You're dealing with somebody who's tested positive twice in less than two years and clearly doesn't think the rules apply to him. |