These cases have significant policy implications. To see two senior executives facing prison terms representing the balance of their lives sends a very strong message. |
They had to have some contingency plan for trial preparations for a case without Causey. Now they just put that plan in place. |
This case is a non-starter that has political appeal, |
This is not somebody who made some inadvertent false statement, ... This is a case where a jury convicted a CEO for lying to two different government agencies. That's a big deal. |
This is the championship game. |
Various counsel have communicated with the government on his behalf since the allegations arose. |
We have the government being very aggressive on the concept of criminal intent in jury charges. And now we have the number two example of it being overturned. |
What it means is they have locked down a key cooperator who can, at a minimum, disprove what has been a publicly articulated key element of her defense, that being the stop-loss order, |
What it means is they have locked down a key cooperator who can, at a minimum, disprove what has been a publicly articulated key element of her defense, that being the stop-loss order. |
What it really means is a shorter, more focused trial, which is better for the government. It probably takes out of the equation some of the more complex accounting issues. The defense was likely hoping to make this case seem like a complex civil financial fraud case, and without Causey, that will be more difficult. |
While it's hard to compare-and-contrast (the two trials), there's no question that prosecutors tried a more streamlined case this time. |
You're painting a picture of more compelling evidence, |