[The trial] is the same as saying, 'Microsoft, you're already too successful, and you have to be handicapped like a horse,' ... It's not the government who decides who is better or smarter - that is done by consumers. |
[Warden told the judge his decision] will shape the rules of competition throughout the entire software industry. ... important to the economy as we move into the 21st century. |
[When asked about internal memos citing where Microsoft executives reportedly mentioned] sucking the air ... colorful language is no sign of evil intentions. |
And what was Netscape's share of the browser market at the end of June 1997? |
But they are free to do it, |
critical water supply state |
Did and still do. |
Do you have any disagreements with Case's statement? |
I don't believe so. |
I don't know if my question had a premise. |
Internet Explorer is not a stand-alone browser because the relevant integration occurred at the design stage. Internet Explorer is an integral feature (of Windows '95), like a shutter in a camera or a transmission in a car. |
Isn't it true that any home user who wants to use Netscape's browsing software has the choice to do so at no cost? |
Isn't it true that Netscape has actually increased the pace of new releases of its browser software as a result of Microsoft's browser software? |
Isn't it true that the most important factor for AOL in choosing Internet Explorer was getting software that worked well with AOL's client software? |
Isn't it true that there's nothing in AOL's contract with Microsoft that limits its ability to give its customers Navigator? |