Certainly it would have significant influence on whether the committee would add a second year. |
The $6,000 payment was a blatant violation. |
The $6,000 payment was a blatant violation. The circumstances surrounding this violation are especially troubling because the former coaches concealed the cash payment from administrators at the institution for over five years. |
The decision before the committee was whether the conduct in the case violated NCAA bylaws. And to that, the committee obviously has a great deal to say. |
The result was an environment that allowed for violations of NCAA legislation. Numerous bylaws were misinterpreted, large numbers of student-athletes were certified improperly and many student-athletes competed while ineligible. |