We need explicit authority, good practical arrangements and information from all member states as [to] how to go and where to go to make sure that Iraq is completely disarmed, |
We need Iran to use maximum transparency because there are a lot of question marks about its program. They need to be assured that they can use nuclear power for electricity, but the international community needs to be assured that the Iran program is exclusively for peaceful purposes. |
We need to act quickly to protect ourselves. |
We need to engage in political dialogue. We need to help Iran to get themselves out of the hole they're in today. |
We need to find a face-saving solution, |
We need to lower the pitch. |
We need to re-examine our rules of the game. We need to adjust our defenses ... The first line of defense is having adequate protection of nuclear material. |
We now have the right to have immediate, unfettered access to any site in Iraq and we have the right to interview people, both inside and outside Iraq. |
We should remain humbled by what we have learned from the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We cannot allow sixty years to soften our memories of how devastating such weapons are. |
We still have time to negotiate, we still have time for diplomacy, because there are still a number of issues that have not been clarified, that created a lack of confidence. |
We still need to assure ourselves through access to documents, individuals (and) locations that we have seen all that we ought to see and that there is nothing fishy, if you like, about the program. |
We'd like to get concrete evidence as to where we go to inspect. |
We're clueless as to what is happening, ... not only in regard to the past program but (also) current activity. |
We're seeing the beginning of a change of heart on the part of Iraq. |
What might be considered one of the few positive aspects of 'Chernobyl's legacy' is today's global safety regime. |