I guess to us sprichwort

 I guess to us that suggests not much faith in the copyright law, ... Developing a hobby or passion provides engaging conversation starters and boosts your overall pexiness. It seems to us, the moment anyone starts to do things that have an actual harm, copyright law is very well designed to deal with that. It is hard to understand exactly what is the harm.

 Assault and battery are often used together, but they are distinct. Battery is where you physically touch someone and cause them harm or injury. Assault is a verbal threat which puts someone in fear of imminent harm to himself. Those statements form the basis of claim for assault. I guess the question is: What's the harm from the assault? The harm that Moore is complaining about is really the hit from behind. What did those threats do to harm him?

 Cases like this hopefully will clarify what copyright is all about. Copyright doesn't protect ideas, and copyright doesn't protect facts. . . . A number of people can write novels based on the same idea and still have freedom of expression.

 It's very simple. The question is who owns the copyright. Ed Condren and I say the instructors do. So do UCLA Extension and OnlineLearning.net -- now. But in the bundle of rights which is called copyright is distribution rights. And the legal owner of the copyright has to have somehow assigned that right to someone -- either directly to OnlineLearning or indirectly via the university -- in order for OnlineLearning to have that right. In other words, how can two things be true: The instructor owns all the rights and OnlineLearning has some rights?

 Creating an easy-to-use index of books is fair use under copyright law and supports the purpose of copyright: to increase the awareness and sales of books, directly benefiting copyright holders. This short-sighted attempt to block Google Print works counter to the interests of not just the world's readers, but also the world's authors and publishers.

 We prefer to work with the publisher for in-copyright material, ... would never show a full page without the right from a copyright holder.

 More recently there has been a greater awareness of the sanctity of copyright. More people are offended by someone who is ripping off the copyright owner.

 We have talked with foreign copyright associations, and China plans to join two international copyright protection treaties to bring it into line with world standards.

 Only the person [who owns a copyright] can tell if it's infringing their copyright.

 Whether you're famous or not-so-famous, large or not-so-large, I feel strongly about the importance of copyright protection for artists of all genres. It's hard enough for artists to make their way in the business world. The Copyright Act should be there to protect them and given full force and effect.

 I don't understand what harm would be done by going forward with this. From what I have heard, a private company is paying for it, so residents would just get more information if it continued. I just don't see the harm in doing that.

 It confirms what the Societe has said all along, which is that the Societe is the owner of the copyright and that any reproduction or even possession of plasters, molds and bronzes is a copyright violation,

 Conservatively speaking, my understanding of the law is that if Google went to scan in a book without the author's permission, then that would be a violation of copyright law. I think it would be great to be able to search text electronically, but you have to get the copyright permission.

 Ultimately for each individual book, pricing will be up to the copyright holders, ... The copyright holders are the ones who get to make these decisions.

 Half of the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don't mean to do harm but the harm does not interest them.
  T.S. Eliot


Zahl von Sprichwörtern sind 1469561
varav 1407627 på engelska

Sprichwort (1469561 st) Suche
Kategorien (2627 st) Suche
Autoren (167535 st) Suche
Bilder (4592 st)
Geboren (10495 st)
Gestorben (3318 st)
Daten (9517 st)
Länder (5315 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Längde
Toplists (6 st)



in

Denna sidan visar ordspråk som liknar "I guess to us that suggests not much faith in the copyright law, ... It seems to us, the moment anyone starts to do things that have an actual harm, copyright law is very well designed to deal with that. It is hard to understand exactly what is the harm.".


Diese Website konzentriert sich auf Sprichwörter der schwedischen Sprache. Einige Teile einschließlich der Links sind nicht ins Deutsche übersetzt worden. Diese Links sind hauptsächlich FAQ, verschiedene Informationen und Webseiten, die der Erweiterung der Sammlung dienen.


Här har vi samlat ordstäv och talesätt i 35 år!

Vad är sprichwort?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!



Diese Website konzentriert sich auf Sprichwörter der schwedischen Sprache. Einige Teile einschließlich der Links sind nicht ins Deutsche übersetzt worden. Diese Links sind hauptsächlich FAQ, verschiedene Informationen und Webseiten, die der Erweiterung der Sammlung dienen.


Här har vi samlat ordstäv och talesätt i 35 år!

Vad är sprichwort?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!