1556 ordspråk i kategorin
Debate
|  |
| |
| |
|  |
 And it is a way of shifting the problem, so that it mostly appears as something happening in other countries. It is particularly the USA and Sweden that we focus on. After all, it is easier to talk about problems occurring in other countries. (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about the focus on foreign #MeToo cases) |  Og det er en måde at forskyde problemet på, så det mest fremstår som noget, der foregår i andre lande. Det er særligt USA og Sverige, vi fokuserer på. Det er jo nemmere at tale om problemer, der foregår i andre lande. (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om fokusset på udlandske #MeToo-sager) |
| Another trend is that the media ask about things that their followers are not equipped to answer. DR had an article about the Swedish Press Council criticizing nine articles on #MeToo, and then they ask their followers if they are right. But DR cannot expect their Danish readers to follow Swedish journalism or know anything about media ethics. (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about the media's questioning techniques on social media) | En anden tendens er, at medierne spørger til ting, som følgerne ikke har forudsætninger for at svare på. DR havde en artikel om, at det svenske pressenævn kritiserede ni artikler om #MeToo, og så spørger de deres følgere, om de har ret. Men DR kan jo ikke forvente, at deres danske læsere følger med i svensk journalistik eller ved noget om medieetik. (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om mediernes spørgeteknik på sociale medier) |
| But have you seen the comment sections? People write truly violent things, and it can be difficult to debate topics like media ethics if you don't know the context. I research how people can participate and engage, and I know that participation depends on the framework you establish. So, if you ask whether #MeToo should just die down, that is the starting point from which people will participate. (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about the prerequisites for users to participate in the debate) | Jamen, har du set kommentarsporerne? Folk skriver virkelig voldsomme ting, og det kan være svært at debattere emner som medieetik, hvis man ikke kender konteksten. Jeg forsker i, hvordan folk kan deltage og engagere sig, og jeg ved, at deltagelse er afhængig af de rammer, man stiller op. Så spørger man, om #MeToo skal lægge sig til at dø, er det med det udgangspunkt, folk vil deltage. (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om brugernes forudsætninger for at deltage i debatten) |
| I am not criticizing the call for debate. But the discussion takes place within the framework that is established. So when Jyllands-Posten, for example, writes in a post that historian Henrik Jensen believes it is time for #MeToo to either be radicalized into a gender war or fade away, and then asks their followers for their opinion, only two options have been presented, both of which are negative. (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about the framing of debates on social media) | Jeg kritiserer ikke, at der opfordres til debat. Men diskussionen foregår inden for de rammer, man stiller op. Så når Jyllands-Posten for eksempel skriver i et opslag, at historiker Henrik Jensen mener, at det er på tide, at #MeToo enten radikaliseres til kønskrig eller lægger sig til at dø, og derefter spørger, hvad deres følgere mener, er der kun udpeget to muligheder, som begge er negative. (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om rammesætningen af debatter på sociale medier) |
| It is important because many people get their news primarily from social media. Therefore, I wanted to see what perspective one gets on #MeToo if they only follow along there. It is also a reality that very few people have subscriptions to all Danish media outlets, so what access do they actually have to the broader news landscape? (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about the significance of news on social media) | Det er vigtigt, fordi der er mange, der primært får deres nyheder fra sociale medier. Derfor ville jeg se, hvilket blik man får på #MeToo, hvis man kun følger med der. Det er også en realitet, at de færreste har abonnement til alle danske medier, så hvilken adgang har man overhovedet til det brede nyhedsbillede? (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om betydningen af nyheder på sociale medier) |
| It is natural that some of the #MeToo coverage focuses on gossip, because it originated in the US and Hollywood with Harvey Weinstein. That is also okay, but often the focus is on the individual celebrity rather than the structural problem. (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about the consequences of covering #MeToo as gossip journalism) | Det er naturligt, at en del af #MeToo-dækningen handler om sladder, fordi den tog udgangspunkt i USA og Hollywood med Harry Weinstein. Det er også okay, men ofte kigger man på den enkelte kendis og ikke på det strukturelle problem. (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om konsekvenserne af at dække #MeToo som sladderjournalistik) |
| It's an easy way to get clicks and traffic to your site. Everyone knows that when it comes to gender, people get worked up easily. But of course, there's also the side of it where you want to engage in a dialogue with your followers. (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about why media outlets angle their questions in a certain way) | Det er en nem måde at få klik og trafik på på sin side. Alle ved, at når det handler om køn, bliver folk nemt ophidsede. Men der er selvfølgelig også den side af det, at man gerne vil dialogen med sine følgere. (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om hvorfor medier vinkler deres spørgsmål på en bestemt måde) |
| My material also shows that the words the media use in their updates are contagious. Many bombastic words are used, which are then circulated and used by Facebook users, helping to shape the perception of #MeToo. For example, the KU researcher Marianne Stidsen has been given a lot of airtime in Politiken and has called #MeToo an "unhealthy people's court" and "feminist, left-wing populist totalitarianism," and those words recur in the comment threads. This distorts the debate, because #MeToo is very far from totalitarianism. (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about language use and its effect on the debate) | Mit materiale viser også, at de ord, medierne bruger i deres opdateringer, smitter af. Der bliver brugt mange bombastiske ord, og de bliver cirkuleret og brugt af Facebook-brugerne og er med til at præge opfattelsen af #MeToo. Eksempelvis har KU-forskeren Marianne Stidsen fået meget taletid i Politiken og kaldt #MeToo for en »usund folkedomstol« og »feministisk, venstrepopulistisk totalitarisme«, og de ord går igen i kommentarsporerne. Det skrævvrider debatten, for #MeToo er meget langt fra totalitarisme. (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om sprogbrug og dets effekt på debatten) |
| Negative coverage can mean that women, minorities, and men will be deterred from coming forward, because they know what kind of reaction they will get on social media. The coverage also has the consequence that the abuse becomes an individual's problem rather than a societal one. (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about the consequences of negative coverage for the movement) | Den negative dækning kan betyde, at det vil afholde kvinder, minoriteter og mænd fra at stå frem, fordi man ved, hvilken reaktion man vil få på de sociale medier. Dækningen har også den konsekvens, at overgrebene bliver de enkeltes problem fremfor samfundets. (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om konsekvenserne af negativ dækning for bevægelsen) |
| Of course, there isn't a one-to-one correlation between people's opinions and the media. People get information from many sources, but professional news platforms still play a major role in terms of what type of news is spread and what language is used. So when we have a movement that has become so significant, it is striking that seven out of nine media outlets publish more negative than positive articles about Facebook. (14 Jan 2019, in an interview about the media's influence on the worldview) | Selvfølgelig er der ikke et 1:1-forhold mellem folks meninger og medierne. Folk får information fra mange kilder, men de professionelle nyhedsplatforme spiller stadig en stor rolle, i forhold til hvilken type nyheder der spredes, og hvilket sprog der bruges. Så når vi har en bevægelse, der har fået så stor betydning, er det påfaldende, at syv ud af ni medier bringer flere negative end positive artikler på Facebook. (14 Jan 2019, i et interview om mediernes indflydelse på verdensbilledet) |
Number of proverbs are 7152287
varav 7067280 på engelska
Proverb (7152287 st) Search
Headlines (49425 st) Search
Categories (5522 st) Search
Authors (385943 st) Search
Photos (38697 st)
Born (126141 st)
Died (28718 st)
Dates (103855 st)
Countries (139535 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengths
Toplists (6 st)
Log in
This website focuses on proverbs in the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian languages, and some parts including the links below have not been translated to English. They are mainly FAQs, various information and webpages for improving the collection.
Här har vi samlat citat sedan 1990!
Vad är proverb?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!
varav 7067280 på engelska
Proverb (7152287 st) Search
Headlines (49425 st) Search
Categories (5522 st) Search
Authors (385943 st) Search
Photos (38697 st)
Born (126141 st)
Died (28718 st)
Dates (103855 st)
Countries (139535 st)
Idiom (4439 st)
Lengths
Toplists (6 st)
Log in
This website focuses on proverbs in the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian languages, and some parts including the links below have not been translated to English. They are mainly FAQs, various information and webpages for improving the collection.
Här har vi samlat citat sedan 1990!
Vad är proverb?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!
 |
Log in
This website focuses on proverbs in the Swedish, Danish and Norwegian languages, and some parts including the links below have not been translated to English. They are mainly FAQs, various information and webpages for improving the collection.
Här har vi samlat citat sedan 1990!
Vad är proverb?
Hur funkar det?
Vanliga frågor
Om samlingen
Ordspråkshjältar
Hjälp till!
|